WARNING: Some girls have STI's

[Eyeballs]

Community service announcement:

You have been warned gents. She is positive for STDs - she knowingly spread them to my husband after he visited her apartment late last year. I gave consent for hubby to see her.

But I didn't know she was offering natural tho. I know it takes two to tango and he believed her when she said no. He to blame too.

Is this behaviour illegal?

blokes cop crap all the time for their minor antics against SW and justifyably get crucified if it's something devastating like giving a lady a STD with full knowledge - especially a SW. What about SW who get away with this life long setence?

I have spoken with the poster who posted on behalf of a friend and it seems it actually happened a sex worker offering natural spread a STI. I have taken down the name. MRS Langtrees

 

[Mod7]

Strange, your posts indicate you are a guy.

 

[mrys]

Community service announcement:

You have been warned gents. She is positive for STDs - she knowingly spread them to my husband after he visited her apartment late last year. I gave consent for hubby to see her.

But I didn't know she was offering natural tho. I know it takes two to tango and he believed her when she said no. He to blame too.

Is this behaviour illegal?

blokes cop crap all the time for their minor antics against SW and justifyably get crucified if it's something devastating like giving a lady a STD with full knowledge - especially a SW. What about SW who get away with this life long setence?

This is a very confusing post?? It's also slanderous if it's not true.

 

[Chief]

This is a very confusing post?? It's also slanderous if it's not true.

Yes I agree. Is it some sort of vendetta?

 

[Mrs Langtrees]

@Tania Smiley put this post on hold and tell the member if they want it published they will have to call me personally plz

 

[Eyeballs]

Strange, your posts indicate you are a guy.

True post. If I'm a lady a guy or else is irrelevant

 

[Eyeballs]

Yes I agree. Is it some sort of vendetta?

You've been warned. If you want to think that and go ahead and take the risk - you may find out - then that's on you. hope you don't.

 

[Obbie]

Hopefully no one else has been infected. That's if it's true

 

[Mod7]

True post. If I'm a lady a guy or else is irrelevant

Well then if youre a guy then the story is bs and the WL has the right to sue you.

 

[Eyeballs]

Well then if youre a guy then the story is bs and the WL has the right to sue you.

And if it's true?

 

[Eyeballs]

Well then if youre a guy then the story is bs and the WL has the right to sue you.

sounds like a staunch defending boyfriend ^ this guy

 

[Mod7]

Im calling bs

 

[langfordguy82]

You've been warned. If you want to think that and go ahead and take the risk - you may find out - then that's on you. hope you don't.

Doubt anyone here would be stupid enough to go raw with a WL, even if she says she's clean. You've got no way of confirming. Just like we have no way of verifying the validity of this story that was posted at 1am on a Thursday.

 

[Mrs Langtrees]

I have edited and updated on the first thread

 

[johnmatilda]

Now that the SW has been de-identified, how do we know she should be avoided?

 

[Youngboy]

Now that the SW has been de-identified, how do we know she should be avoided?

Yeah indeed what's the point?

Doubt anyone here would be stupid enough to go raw with a WL, even if she says she's clean.

Hahahaha oh sweet summer child

 

[mrys]

This thread is a timely reminder for those that play russian roulette with unsafe sex practices. The more you do it the greater the odds are against you. Just don't do it gents......ever!

 

[langfordguy82]

Hahahaha oh sweet summer child

Very funny. But if you're gona do it you deserve every STD you get

 

[langfordguy82]

Now that the SW has been de-identified, how do we know she should be avoided?

You need to assume they all might have something and behave accordingly.

 

[johnmatilda]

You need to assume they all might have something and behave accordingly.

Agreed. While you can wrap up the weaner, you can't wrap up the ball sack which will be slapping against her privates. And if she has warts or something not visible, then what?

 

[Youngboy]

Very funny. But if you're gona do it you deserve every STD you get

People need to accept the consequences of their own actions, no disagreement on that. But that's a very different point from suggesting no one here would choose to partake in higher risk activities...

You need to assume they all might have something and behave accordingly.

Yeah... I don't get guys who are obsessed with what WL do with other people, the whole point of using protection is that either party might have something.

Agreed. While you can wrap up the weaner, you can't wrap up the ball sack which will be slapping against her privates. And if she has warts or something not visible, then what?

Nothing is risk free so it's all about choosing a risk level one is happy with in my opinion. It's more of a spectrum that a binary "completely safe" vs "guaranteed dangerous". I'm fairly risk averse and will act accordingly, nothing against those who choose to live more dangerously, each to their own.

 

[langfordguy82]

But that's a very different point from suggesting no one here would choose to partake in higher risk activities

I never said all people, I said most people. I know there's deviants out there. I stand by what I said.

 

[langfordguy82]

I never said all people, I said most people. I know there's deviants out there. I stand by what I said.

Actually you're right, I did say "anyone here". I meant most people. Zzzz internet.

 

[pillinger]

I see WLs all the time. I never do natural, even if it's offered, even if it's a natural BJ. And I always shower at the WLs place straight after. I would have thought that is the sensible thing to do when seeing WLs.

 

[zebca]

I see WLs all the time. I never do natural, even if it's offered, even if it's a natural BJ. And I always shower at the WLs place straight after. I would have thought that is the sensible thing to do when seeing WLs.

I am similar to you in my view of natural services.

Actually you're right, I did say "anyone here". I meant most people. Zzzz internet.

I believe majority of punters want to engage in or try / do engage in natural services. Why else does every girl state in their ad 'no natural', because she is probably being pestered by so many guys asking her about it.

Some WL have told me they don't like how many guys are continually pushing them to do natural, some WL have offered natural services to me unprompted and I can only assume its because thats what most guys are looking for.
Also there are some girls who are known for offering natural and are very popular because of that fact and people seek out those girls.

I think its not worth the risk, but some people don't mind taking that risk.

 

[Tania Smiley]

This thread is a timely reminder for those that play russian roulette with unsafe sex practices. The more you do it the greater the odds are against you. Just don't do it gents......ever!

100%

Why take the risk. It's just not worth it,,,,EVER.

 

[Nina Stone]

Having sexual contact with ANYONE is and will always be a risk. It is upto both parties to decide what they partake it. Safe sex practices at all times is the best policy to ensure protection from STIs spreading, no matter who, no matter where

 

[georgo]

I am similar to you in my view of natural services.


I believe majority of punters want to engage in or try / do engage in natural services. Why else does every girl state in their ad 'no natural', because she is probably being pestered by so many guys asking her about it.

Some WL have told me they don't like how many guys are continually pushing them to do natural, some WL have offered natural services to me unprompted and I can only assume its because thats what most guys are looking for.
Also there are some girls who are known for offering natural and are very popular because of that fact and people seek out those girls.

I think its not worth the risk, but some people don't mind taking that risk.

WL gets more for $$$ natural service so the girls will do it.

 

[mrys]

WL gets more for $$$ natural service so the girls will do it.

Yes sadly that's why they do it. But all that financial gain is lost when they have to stop working because of an STI. The real horror is the prospect of them continuing to work knowing they have one!

 

[Mod7]

Yes sadly that's why they do it. But all that financial gain is lost when they have to stop working because of an STI. The real horror is the prospect of them continuing to work knowing they have one!

I find few offer it and as soon as I see it its a red flag. We all know the consequences. Its not like going bare with a girlfriend or your wife, WL's see many many men in the couple of weeks before symptoms appear for them, and then you. If anyone offers bare I immediately assume they have herpes as a minimum. But still there has always been guys who dont give a fuck and they shoulx google the photos.