• If you are having any problems posting threads plz message Kate. since latest update we have had 6 members with problems, sorted those but yet to find the problem.

Reviews versus Photos

Lacie Tomson

Lacie Tomson

Gold Member
For the punters...

When booking a WL/Escort from online selections, do you read reviews? Or, do you base your selection on photos? And if it is on photos do you check that they are validated photos (ie not look alike pics)

PS On the same line of questioning, what do you think of my new avatar?

Always Lacie x
 
Both. I usually look for any reviews, and check them against my 'Review index' - who is reliable, who mirrors my taste, who is a dickhead.

If there is a good review by someone I know, then I am keen to make a booking.

If there is no review available, or only one by someone who is a bit sus in my records (some people just say anything, others are clearly biased for or against a particular WL), then sometimes I take a punt (Pun intended), then I look at the pics very carefully )including Tineye), and decide to take a chance or not.

Sometimes I am lucky. I have never struck a really bad punt yet !

Cheers.
 
sunyun said:
Both. I usually look for any reviews, and check them against my 'Review index' - who is reliable, who mirrors my taste, who is a dickhead.

If there is a good review by someone I know, then I am keen to make a booking.

If there is no review available, or only one by someone who is a bit sus in my records (some people just say anything, others are clearly biased for or against a particular WL), then sometimes I take a punt (Pun intended), then I look at the pics very carefully )including Tineye), and decide to take a chance or not.

Sometimes I am lucky. I have never struck a really bad punt yet !

Cheers.
Click to expand...

Thank you Sunyun for the feedback... x
 
Both. I always book ahead even when going to a parlour. So I will read profile, look at pictures and search for reviews. I'm parting with my hard earned so I'm going to do my homework first.

I also like a woman who has clearly taken some time to write a profile in something above year 5 English. I feel you can tell a fair bit from what and how she writes her profile.

P.S. Great avatar. :)
 
AxeMan said:
Both. I always book ahead even when going to a parlour. So I will read profile, look at pictures and search for reviews. I'm parting with my hard earned so I'm going to do my homework first.

I also like a woman who has clearly taken some time to write a profile in something above year 5 English. I feel you can tell a fair bit from what and how she writes her profile.

P.S. Great avatar. :)
Click to expand...

Thank you Axeman, just an added question, do you heck if the pics are verified (not look alike)?
 
I prefer no pics to phoney photos. Omission is preferable to deception, even if they are 'lookalikes' intended to give an idea of the WL (they rarely do that well).

Where genuine images are included, they are useful in that it gives me a basic idea of her figure, hair, etc. so I can determine if she is my type. If she is, then I will try and see if there are any reviews -- mainly to check if there is a record of consistently good (or bad) service -- though as mentioned above, reviews can be notoriously unreliable unless they are from punters with an established record of honest feedback. If the photos indicate she is unlikely to float my boat (e.g. too skinny/anorexic, covered head-to-toe in tatts, etc.), there is no point reading further.

On several occasions, however, I have taken a genuine punt based solely on the written description in ads and (for PWLs) her voice on the phone. How she communicates can usually give a good idea of how we'll get along during any booking and a woman's voice and tone is often a remarkably reliable indicator of her sexiness. These have resulted in a mix of so-so sessions and uncovering excellent long-standing favourites.
 
XLNC said:
I prefer no pics to phoney photos. Omission is preferable to deception, even if they are 'lookalikes' intended to give an idea of the WL (they rarely do that well).

Where genuine images are included, they are useful in that it gives me a basic idea of her figure, hair, etc. so I can determine if she is my type. If she is, then I will try and see if there are any reviews -- mainly to check if there is a record of consistently good (or bad) service -- though as mentioned above, reviews can be notoriously unreliable unless they are from punters with an established record of honest feedback. If the photos indicate she is unlikely to float my boat (e.g. too skinny/anorexic, covered head-to-toe in tatts, etc.), there is no point reading further.

On several occasions, however, I have taken a genuine punt based solely on the written description in ads and (for PWLs) her voice on the phone. How she communicates can usually give a good idea of how we'll get along during any booking and a woman's voice and tone is often a remarkably reliable indicator of her sexiness. These have resulted in a mix of so-so sessions and uncovering excellent long-standing favourites.
Click to expand...

I agree entirely. I had very poor quality, but real pics for the last 6 weeks, as I would detest having the "you don't look anything like your pics" conversation while on escort.
I have now (as depicted in avatar) some better quality photos, but am hoping to get some more.
I am also very proud of my reviews to date.
Thanks for the feedback x
 
I hope that photo wasn't taken inside the VIP Lounge -- otherwise things have gone downhill since my last visit! :joyful: But a very enticing shot of the main subject. :)
 
XLNC said:
I hope that photo wasn't taken inside the VIP Lounge -- otherwise things have gone downhill since my last visit! :joyful: But a very enticing shot of the main subject. :)
Click to expand...


Too funny XLNC, definitely not inside the prestigious VIP lounge.
On shoot, down a back alley lol x
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top