• If you are having any problems posting threads plz message Kate. since latest update we have had 6 members with problems, sorted those but yet to find the problem.

O:Dear nose to the grindstone again

  • Thread starter Thread starter Farm Boy
  • Start date Start date
F

Farm Boy

THE former mistress to the late cardboard billionaire Richard Pratt has lost her bid for a slice of his millions.

Madison Ashton sued Mr Pratt's widow, claiming her late husband had promised her he would set up a $2.5 million trust for each of her two children, pay her a $500,000 annual allowance and $36,000 for her annual rent bill.

She also claimed Pratt promised to pay her $30,000 a year in business expenses, such as travel.

But NSW Supreme Court Judge Paul Brereton today ruled that the former high class escort should not be entitled to the money from his estate.

He said her claim failed because her agreement with Pratt was not "enforceable and binding".

"The claims were not maintainable because they were subject to her February 2005 acceptance of $100,000 in full and final satisfaction".
 
Might be the wrong day to order a bit of BDSM from Ms Ashton.

Your right TD Really make sure your vocal chords are primed For when you
need to scream that safety word Because she will be really skinning that nice pelt of yours in that mood
 
Maybe all the Carlton faithful can chip in to help her in retirement
must be a few thousand blues fans put up $5 each then have a raffle three lucky members get 1HR
See what its like to be Carlton Prez for a hour Instead of the blue baggers they can be
McQueen Shaggers
 
I think that outfit she wore in court may have been Carlton blue H2.
 
What Pratt and McQueen got up to was there own biss and good luck to them but Ashton / McQueen was after Mrs Pratt"s money
 
There's a lesson for everyone in there: a verbal contract ain't worth diddly. If it's not in writing, it does not count.
 
Ouch



Ms Ashton has been ordered to pay Jeanne Pratt's legal costs.

Loser usually pays.

Lawyers always win.

I wonder if she knew the risk of losing? Did her lawyer appropriately advise her?

Expensive legal action over an alleged verbal agreement to override a written agreement.

Open and shut case for Mrs Pratt. (Maybe 100 to 1 shot instead - nothing is certain - except the lawyers win)
 
Back
Top