• If you are having any problems posting threads plz message Kate. since latest update we have had 6 members with problems, sorted those but yet to find the problem.

False pics - a solution?

waterbaby

waterbaby

Silver Member
Having read many complaints about the use of false pictures in WL's advertisements I have a simple solution. This only works for the honest and professional ladies but surly these are the ones we are interested in seeing. The lady simply needs to take a picture of herself with a smart phone holding the front page of a recent daily newspaper and SMS it to you. Bingo, you know it is a recent photo and that it is the lady with whom you have been speaking (hopefully). I recognize that the unscrupulous ladies may take a picture of a PYT (pretty young thing) rather than one of her own less attractive frame however, at least you can show the picture she sent when you arrive and therefore have reasonable grounds to leave. Ladies who are keen to develop their business and have nothing to hide so to speak should not have an issue with potential clients asking for this. The juxtaposition here would be that the ladies could ask for an SMS picture of the client, this could be open for misuse however!
Happy times - Waterbaby
 
Re: False pics - a solution

The working ladies wouldn't do it, vanity, very difficult to take a flattering self pic, and how many ladies would buy the daily newspaper.
Our new verification system is nearly ready, so when you hover over the verification tick you can see who verified the photo and how, personal meeting, video cam or photo & date.
Lisa, Sue and Myself are the only three allowed to do verification for Langtrees.com at the moment. When the new system comes into play agencies will be allowed to verify their own lady profiles and then the madam name will show.
I have already suspended three Asian profiles on Langtrees.com as I had complaints and I gave them the chance to verify or change and they didn't reply.
 
Re: False pics - a solution

and how many ladies would buy the daily newspaper.

Well that depends Marryanne are they ?

Too dumb to read?

Too busy to read?

So computer savvy newspapers are redundant?

Or maybe too smart to cover there hot body"s with a bloody great big broadsheet .
 
Try to google tinyeye
Sometimes it will find u if that photo on other site
 
Tineye is useful but, sadly, not a definitive test.

I ran some of my collection of Playboy pics past it and it only picked the obvious and well-known ones like Pam Anderson, Victoria Silvstedt etc. It seems that is the pic is altered enough, ie by blurring the face, that will fool it.
 
It is sad the WL feels she or he has to do this.
We all age and there is beauty in all ages.
A sexy smile, a sexy wink, a gentle touch and I am yours.
 
As a matter of fact i saw a client a few days ago who complained to me that he had spent 900 $ for an hr on a private girl from Syd , the service she had promised him she didnt perform and the picture of the girl was false and misleading ..so there u go i was quite surprised but it happens ..
 
Let's be realistic here, WLs need there privacy protected how would she know the potential punter is not a friend or family member.and there are plenty of supposed potential punters who would not book but would just be compiling their own personal wank books as such.
My recommendation would be Langtrees.com ,all photos are verified up to date and genuine or marked look a like only.
Problem solved.
 
tania smiley said:
let's be realistic here, wls need there privacy protected how would she know the potential punter is not a friend or family member.and there are plenty of supposed potential punters who would not book but would just be compiling their own personal wank books as such.
My recommendation would be langtrees.com ,all photos are verified up to date and genuine or marked look a like only.
Problem solved.
Click to expand...

wank book can not we keep just one secret from these damn woman
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top