Belmont | Susie | Erotic Massage

seen her years and years ago - I can't remember but reading memories recalls - massage was good, but don't think i went for seconds
 
Saw Susie just before the festive break. Very pleasant experience, starting with a clean room and friendly personality, I found her attractive with the right kind of curves.

She wasn't particularly chatty but I wasn't really pushing for convo myself either. Massage was lovely, FS on offer, and far from a clock watcher. After we finished she noticed I had a sore shoulder and spent another half 20mins focused on that before the shower. Well and truly overtime but she didn't care, greatly appreciated that.

Only negative was the shower was in a bit of disrepair but she said she was getting it fixed.

Will be returning for sure, especially given she's one of the few WL's to not have upped her prices yet
 
It was a few years ago or probably more .. I did go in, but didnt want to be there and will never put myself in that position again.
it was the longest 30 minutes of my life!
 
Last edited:
chocy said:
Please tell me shes alot more appealing than the Malay suzie in Midland.. Omg I couldn't believe you guys found her good.. i wanted to run when she opened the door.
Click to expand...
If this is the other susie that was previously on Walter Rd I very much agree with you.


I do question if some of the folks raving about that Susie were in actually referring to this Susie.
 
Hey I’ve seen both. The Malay Suzy is much older but was very friendly. Thai Susie is sexier in my opinion and has a great body plus like everyone mentions great personality and massage
 
chocy said:
Please tell me shes alot more appealing than the Malay suzie in Midland.. Omg I couldn't believe you guys found her good.. i wanted to run when she opened the door.
Click to expand...
Be careful you might pull a hammy doing a exit like that chocy 😅
 
edmund79 said:
Took a long 30mins drive to Belmont. The Suzie that open door is old, I have to walk upon seeing her. One meat is another man poison. Yo each his own.
Click to expand...
Agreed, each to their own.
Like many, I'm probably the older age bracket, so the age isn't ever an issue with me.
But when reviewers say a lady is pleasant and friendly and clean premises and attractive enough and good massage and not a clock watcher and reasonable rates, etc - that ticks a heck of a lot more boxes than most I'll ever get to see.

(and, ah that long 30 mins drive. It's not too far people, it's Perth, so about 20 - 25 kms max, same time and distance getting to work for many. A dead giveaway some of us are not from the Metro where everything is just down the road and 30 mins is just around the corner).
 
Channelle said:
Agreed, each to their own.
Like many, I'm probably the older age bracket, so the age isn't ever an issue with me.
But when reviewers say a lady is pleasant and friendly and clean premises and attractive enough and good massage and not a clock watcher and reasonable rates, etc - that ticks a heck of a lot more boxes than most I'll ever get to see.

(and, ah that long 30 mins drive. It's not too far people, it's Perth, so about 20 - 25 kms max, same time and distance getting to work for many. A dead giveaway some of us are not from the Metro where everything is just down the road and 30 mins is just around the corner).
Click to expand...
If you don't get caught in morning or afternoon peak hour in Perth you'll be fine.
 
Boop it said:
Saw Susie just before the festive break. Very pleasant experience, starting with a clean room and friendly personality, I found her attractive with the right kind of curves.

She wasn't particularly chatty but I wasn't really pushing for convo myself either. Massage was lovely, FS on offer, and far from a clock watcher. After we finished she noticed I had a sore shoulder and spent another half 20mins focused on that before the shower. Well and truly overtime but she didn't care, greatly appreciated that.

Only negative was the shower was in a bit of disrepair but she said she was getting it fixed.

Will be returning for sure, especially given she's one of the few WL's to not have upped her prices yet
Click to expand...


good review mate
 
Channelle said:
Agreed, each to their own.
Like many, I'm probably the older age bracket, so the age isn't ever an issue with me.
But when reviewers say a lady is pleasant and friendly and clean premises and attractive enough and good massage and not a clock watcher and reasonable rates, etc - that ticks a heck of a lot more boxes than most I'll ever get to see.

(and, ah that long 30 mins drive. It's not too far people, it's Perth, so about 20 - 25 kms max, same time and distance getting to work for many. A dead giveaway some of us are not from the Metro where everything is just down the road and 30 mins is just around the corner).
Click to expand...


lady is pleasant and friendly and clean premises and attractive enough and good massage and not a clock watcher - not many like this now a day
 
Direct101 said:
lady is pleasant and friendly and clean premises and attractive enough and good massage and not a clock watcher - not many like this now a day
Click to expand...
The issue depends on the personal preference for women, young and fresh vs old and nice. The eyes have to be satisfied and feel happy with the experience. The d8fference between both would be few hundred bucks. It like selecting the wife of Trump vs the wife of Macron to save few 100 dollars. I would take the wife of president trup, enjoy the experience and dream about it for many months.
 
Mon said:
The issue depends on the personal preference for women, young and fresh vs old and nice. The eyes have to be satisfied and feel happy with the experience. The d8fference between both would be few hundred bucks. It like selecting the wife of Trump vs the wife of Macron to save few 100 dollars. I would take the wife of president trup, enjoy the experience and dream about it for many months.
Click to expand...
I bet then there'd be 1 person who would think "you're not a very nice person, who do you wotk for?, etc, etc."🤪🤪
 
This Susie is on Wright Street in Belmont? I saw her about 8 months ago, the massage was reasonable, the FS was ok but nothing to write home about. I didn't find her sexy, big tits which I think are bolt-ons, some tummy and a bit of flab. Lovely lady, not a clock watcher, just didn't appeal to me.
 
D996R said:
I didn't find her sexy, bolt-ons, some tummy and a bit of flab, just didn't appeal to me .. but the FS was ok.
Click to expand...
Perhaps thinking too much, but got me thinking about your comments - if one agrees and pays upfront, do punters feel obliged that they simply must press on to FS - or pull out early so to speak and renegotiate before FS - if clearly one doesn't find the lady appealing?
 
  • Like
Reactions: wrb
Channelle said:
Perhaps thinking too much, but got me thinking about your comments - if one agrees and pays upfront, do punters feel obliged that they simply must press on to FS - or pull out early so to speak and renegotiate before FS - if clearly one doesn't find the lady appealing?
Click to expand...
I have paid upfront for 30 minutes and handjob then declined full service or blowjob.
 
  • Like
Reactions: wrb
D996R said:
This Susie is on Wright Street in Belmont? I saw her about 8 months ago, the massage was reasonable, the FS was ok but nothing to write home about. I didn't find her sexy, big tits which I think are bolt-ons, some tummy and a bit of flab. Lovely lady, not a clock watcher, just didn't appeal to me.
Click to expand...
I don’t think they are bolt ons. They felt pretty natural when they were in my hands and mouth
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top