• If you are having any problems posting threads plz message Kate. since latest update we have had 6 members with problems, sorted those but yet to find the problem.

Profile pictures

  • Thread starter Thread starter msmagdelena
  • Start date Start date
M

msmagdelena

Hi guys,
I am curious to know when you are viewing the profile pictures of girls on the web, which ones stand out the most -

Are they

The ones that show their best assets?

The ones that are fully naked or those subtly clothed?

Do you find you are more likely to choose a girl who has her face showing than one who doesn't?

Does the quality of the photos make an impression?
that is - if its taken with the mobile phone, a little blurry, pair of men's boots & a messy bed in the background get your vote, or are you more likely to be drawn to a classy, professionally taken shot showing the BEST of HER?

regards,

Ms Magdelena
 
I actually would prefer candid shots done. Professionally taken, especially in a studio could be deemed as "unreliable". For example shots of the lovely Lilian (hope I got the name right), looks definitely more real to me. It also reveals another layer of personality.
 
I understand the need for some W/L's to maintain anonymity if their career choice isn't known by all their friends and family, but faces mean so much that I'd be much more drawn to a real looking person with at least an idea of what their face might look like, but I'm not a punter and never will be, so my opinion probably isn't the best to go by.
However, I once saw a photo of a lady in an ad in our paper that damn near had me converted. A very normal photo of just her head and shoulders, and real girl next door looks, but so "attractive" as in something that really attracts you to it, not just meaning pretty. I'd never have had that level of attraction to a photo of a boob, bum, or ....
For me the face wins.
 
Professional photos aren't necessarily studio based. As a photographer our job is angle and light. Therefore showing a person at there best whether it be in a glam bedroom or in the toilet. A pro can make u look good anywhere.

And yes I'm put off by tacky photos. I think it's the biggest let down I've seen. I dnt visit w/l's currently but if I were I want to visit someone with passion for there working life. Not someone doing it to make money but actually enjoy what they do.

I think photos definatly convey someone who is actually enjoying there career rather there job.

But I am a professional photographer so I'm biased.
 
Well you may be surprised to know that Lillian's were done by our pro photographer & luckily he has managed to capture her personality.

Ishihara said:
I actually would prefer candid shots done. Professionally taken, especially in a studio could be deemed as "unreliable". For example shots of the lovely Lilian (hope I got the name right), looks definitely more real to me. It also reveals another layer of personality.
Click to expand...
 
I spent nearly 2 months/ 10hours a day, 5 days a week, researching private girl profiles on the net & what used to make me laugh was the ones that would say they were "ELITE" & charge $500+/hr, but couldn't even be bothered to put a decent photo up.

After running my own business for years, I can tell you that the product HAS to match the price and a lot of WL's forget that they ARE their product. So In my opinion, the ones that I took the time to read on were the ones with good photos. of course the tacky ones drew my attention for a whole other reason - for a laugh.

I hope that more WLs will take the time to reflect themselves in a better light AND make sure they stand out in the crowd.
 
Photos are everything. I need to know I'd be attracted to the person. More skin showing the better, no nasty little surprises. Ofcourse some girls can't afford pro shots but that is ok as long as they are artistic in a way. Not just standing there looking glum
 
sexnut said:
Photos are everything. I need to know I'd be attracted to the person. More skin showing the better, no nasty little surprises. Ofcourse some girls can't afford pro shots but that is ok as long as they are artistic in a way. Not just standing there looking glum
Click to expand...

Summed it up perfectly SexyNut....
 
Most girls can get there shots done for free. If u shoot nude for the photog and allow them to use them in exhibitions they won't charge u. People pay big dollars for artistic nudes.

But be weary of amateurs who just want to wank off to your photos and have no idea about composition, posing, lighting etc.

Editorial type of shots are by far the best for me but others would like that playboy gash out slut look. Keep it sophisticated.

But theres dirty old men who would prefer a cock in the girls ass. Everyone's different. I just personally think its tacky and vulgar.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top