Privates On Cracker

[xZaidax]

So this evening a lovely client came in and told us of a disappointing escort on Cracker. He showed us the ad and the images and then proceeded to explain what she actually looked like. Upon closer inspection (being the pervert that I am sometimes) I realised they were images from an adult magazine.

Now not bragging but the Ladies at Langtrees advertise with their own photos or make it clear that the images are of a look-a-like due to privacy reasoning.

Have you ever arrived at a private escort's house after browsing cracker or other advertising sites and been severly disappointed?​

 

[XLNC]

I don't think I've been totally conned with phoney photos though have seen a couple of ladies who didn't scrub up as well in the flesh as in their glamour shots. Any WLs who use images that are obviously not genuine, I steer clear of, especially as they are usually the ones charging an arm and a leg and a kidney.

 

[sunyun]

I always check with Tineye, and so have not had the experience.

I have, however, contacted a WL off Cracker/Locanto/Perth Backpage and asked if they have real pic of themselves as all the ones on the site belong to porn stars off the web.

I have had some interesting replies.

Many have not bothered to reply. Some have send me rude replies - which I consider sad, as my questions have always been framed politely, and could have led to them discovering why they have not been as successful as they could have.
I have had a few ladies get back to me with explanations such as lookalike for safety/privacy, waiting for studio shoot pics to arrive, didn't want family/boy friend to find out.

One or two over the years have asked how I knew, and after I told them about Tineye, they were quite grateful and I have seen at least one change her pics within a week - the new ones may or may not have been of her, but they sure did not register on Tineye !

Somewhere in 'WL for Dummies' there should be a chapter on Tineye and other reverse search engines.