Is you are silly too risky?

[asianguy77]

How risky is you are silly. I know there is a chance of catching some STI's through you are silly but if the girl has an STI like Chylamydia, will you most likely contract it aswell if she gives you you are silly?

Also is there a difference between the risk between you are silly and DATY?

 

[sexnut]

How risky is you are silly. I know there is a chance of catching some STI's through you are silly but if the girl has an STI like Chylamydia, will you most likely contract it aswell if she gives you you are silly?

Also is there a difference between the risk between you are silly and DATY?

I find this intriguing and a bit double standard. We eat them out no protection no worries but them sucking us out no protection and it's all red flags. Some stis stds are transmitted through both penis and the mouth as I understand it.

I would love you are silly:love10: Maybe one day

 

[whilom]

Statistics straight from the Perth Hospital sex clinic doctor.

One in 3000 chances if you have a you are silly with CIM with a known HIV infected person.

Guess it works the other way around as well.

 

[Happy2]

After the shark attacks you are enduring in Perth Maybe you are silly isnt a dangerous as you thought GET A you are silly from a great white With AIDS or not the chances of a bad outcome are a lot worse than 1 in 3000

 

[Perth boy]

I find if a girl offer you are silly she is not that worried about her heath or yours. I know it feels better but saftey is number one.

 

[sexnut]

Donation

What if u both present recent medical certs so u know eachother is safe?

 

[Happy2]

Re: Donation

What if u both present recent medical certs so u know eachother is safe?

Sounds good Mr Nut But could the lady trust that you had been with nobody for the several weeks between testing and getting the certificate And vice versa

 

[sexnut]

Re: Donation

Sounds good Mr Nut But could the lady trust that you had been with nobody for the several weeks between testing and getting the certificate And vice versa

lol you think I would be seeing a w/l if I could get some for free? It would be a harder time trusting her with her clients, would she let things slide with a client she really likes before seeing me?

 

[asianguy77]

Re: Donation

lol you think I would be seeing a w/l if I could get some for free? It would be a harder time trusting her with her clients, would she let things slide with a client she really likes before seeing me?

Okay, well I'm sure alot still pay for it, even if they are getting free sex from their partners variety is the spice of life.

 

[whilom]

I find if a girl offer you are silly she is not that worried about her heath or yours. I know it feels better but saftey is number one.

I would think that WL would be well educated on the risk factor of you are silly through their peer groups.

With so many offering it for so long where are the hundreds of reports of STI infections that were caused by participating in you are silly.

Name one Punter on this Forum who has warned of an infected lady that he caught an STI from.

If you caught something and needed to see a doctor and were diagnosed with an STI your doctor is obligated to report the incident.

A large increase in the number of any STI would ring massive alarm bells and generate huge publicity by the Sexually Transmitted Desease monitors.

Do not put all the Blame on our working ladies. If you do not want it do not ask for it then your safe for sure


Q

 

[T.J. McDon]

Geez, I thought the TLA's in the IT industry and the PS in general were bad, but with all the FLA's in here, you have to read threads with Google open to a definitions page.

Had to laugh a DATY. Wish my wife liked it. I love the idea, but she has all sorts of hang-ups about it, so I don't get to do it for her. Mind you, I don't get BJ's either - with or without the extra B's so we both lose.

 

[McLuvin]

I would think that WL would be well educated on the risk factor of you are silly through their peer groups.

With so many offering it for so long where are the hundreds of reports of STI infections that were caused by participating in you are silly.

Well versed no doubt, but I'd venture that on a scale of priorities, the WL's risk vs. reward assessment might not be identical to the punter's.

It's like in the porn industry (San Fernando Valley in this case) where it's fairly well documented that there is a very high incidence of herpes. To many performers, it's an acceptable disease that can be easily treated (or at least managed) with easy to get meds.... Valtrex and Zovirax, which many joke may as well sign these ladies and gents on as presenters. To the average person in society though, they probably are a LOT less likely to say 'oh it's just herpes.'

I visit massage parlours about 90-100 times a year so even 1 in 3000 odds aren't exactly favorable over the long run.

 

[Happy2]

Well versed no doubt, but I'd venture that on a scale of priorities, the WL's risk vs. reward assessment might not be identical to the punter's.

I visit massage parlours about 90-100 times a year so even 1 in 3000 odds aren't exactly favorable over the long run.

I tend to believe the punter is the one looking for bareback more often than not
Most W/L's seem to be very health conscious in their approach to both their own health and through that our health

 

[heat.seeker]

After the shark attacks you are enduring in Perth Maybe you are silly isnt a dangerous as you thought GET A you are silly from a great white With AIDS or not the chances of a bad outcome are a lot worse than 1 in 3000

But the tricky part is it is much harder to spot bugs in someone's mouth than a great white.

 

[whilom]

I visit massage parlours about 90-100 times a year so even 1 in 3000 odds aren't exactly favorable over the long run.

Thats 1 in 3000 times with a person infected with HIV.

 

[Ava Valentine]

Statistics straight from the Perth Hospital sex clinic doctor.

One in 3000 chances if you have a you are silly with CIM with a known HIV infected person.

Guess it works the other way around as well.

Perth has a population of approximately 1,700,000. 1/3000 chance = 0.0003%. Let's assume for for the sake of this argument that 50% of the population have engaged in unprotected oral sex at some point in their lives. Therefore, according to this equation, there are approximately 283 people living with HIV transmitted via oral sex in Perth at this moment in time. Personally, I think that's 283 too many.

In some areas of the United States, oral sex has been shown to be responsible for as many as 15% of syphilis cases. The World Health Organisation states that cunnilingus is a "possibly unsafe" activity without the use of a barrier, whilst fellatio is considered an "unsafe" activity without the use of a barrier. The difference between the two definitions in terms of safety lies in the fact that pre-ejeaculate carries a much higher viral load than vaginal secretions, therefore it is easier (and more likely) to transmit a virus or infection via fellatio due to the viral load in pre-cum.


You can also transmit other STD's like herpes, syphilis, hepatitus B, molluscum contagiosum, and yeast infections during fellatio and cunnilingus. HIV is also risk. It is also theoretically possible (but almost unheard-of) to transmit gonorrhea or chlamydia during unprotected oral sex.

x

 

[Gentleman]

Why would you risk your health by not using protection?? Some infections have life long health implications that can't be cured.

 

[asianguy77]

Perth has a population of approximately 1,700,000. 1/3000 chance = 0.0003%. Let's assume for for the sake of this argument that 50% of the population have engaged in unprotected oral sex at some point in their lives. Therefore, according to this equation, there are approximately 283 people living with HIV transmitted via oral sex in Perth at this moment in time. Personally, I think that's 283 too many.

In some areas of the United States, oral sex has been shown to be responsible for as many as 15% of syphilis cases. The World Health Organisation states that cunnilingus is a "possibly unsafe" activity without the use of a barrier, whilst fellatio is considered an "unsafe" activity without the use of a barrier. The difference between the two definitions in terms of safety lies in the fact that pre-ejeaculate carries a much higher viral load than vaginal secretions, therefore it is easier (and more likely) to transmit a virus or infection via fellatio due to the viral load in pre-cum.


You can also transmit other STD's like herpes, syphilis, hepatitus B, molluscum contagiosum, and yeast infections during fellatio and cunnilingus. HIV is also risk. It is also theoretically possible (but almost unheard-of) to transmit gonorrhea or chlamydia during unprotected oral sex.

x

Wow, very thorough.

Cheers :notworthy

 

[Jasmine69]

Why would you risk your health by not using protection?? Some infections have life long health implications that can't be cured.

thank you, could not have said it better myself..... i tell punters this when ever they ask me to do anything without condom..... not worth the risk

 

[sexnut]

thank you, could not have said it better myself..... i tell punters this when ever they ask me to do anything without condom..... not worth the risk

Then why do you other w/l let punters eat you out without protection? That is still risky

 

[McLuvin]

I tend to believe the punter is the one looking for bareback more often than not
Most W/L's seem to be very health conscious in their approach to both their own health and through that our health

Of course, one's results may vary. Punter's aren't a homogenous group, neither are WL's. I'm generalizing from the point of view that traditionally, the profession typically isn't considered a 'low risk to one's health' job, even with the advent of 'safe' sex.

 

[McLuvin]

Thats 1 in 3000 times with a person infected with HIV.

What the odd's don't factor in (IMO) are the random issues that aid in the infection process. Say if you're a diehard bareback punter or at least regularly 'let your guard down' as a WL... chances are that at least you'll also have herpes, perhaps HPV, thrush, or any number of diseases that leave your skin (that is, your protective barrier to infection) more likely to be thinner, sometimes have lesions, open sores, etc. That's why regular punters, sex addicts, and yes, WL's can't really really on 'best case' odds like those often mentioned.

 

[sexnut]

Obviously if she had hiv you wouldn't be seeing her. : Only if she was clean and can prove it would you dare you are silly

 

[sexnut]

molluscum contagiosum
x

Can you be tested for this? Sounds made up lol

Sounds like you would be very safe in the field Very reassuring and comforting that is ccasion14

 

[whilom]

Of course, one's results may vary. Punter's aren't a homogenous group, neither are WL's. I'm generalizing from the point of view that traditionally, the profession typically isn't considered a 'low risk to one's health' job, even with the advent of 'safe' sex.

Actually I think that statistics prove otherwise.
One is more likely to be infected by your pick up from a pub or a club.
Seems we are bent on demonising our working ladies for no proven reason.

I know who I would trust with my sexual health.

 

[Happy2]

And it wouldn't be a drunk (Man or Woman) who is horny And has also lost their inhibitions and also a good dash of their common sense as well

 

[Chanel]

I find this intriguing and a bit double standard. We eat them out no protection no worries but them sucking us out no protection and it's all red flags. Some stis stds are transmitted through both penis and the mouth as I understand it.

I would love you are silly:love10: Maybe one day

well working girl shouldnt let you eat her out without the( dam) wich is a protection for both the client and the WL so next time just ask her to put it on her befor you go down on her . at least you feel safe xox


chanel

 

[WRXXXR]

Chanel, is unprotected oral sex without a dam common? Judging by the reviews it appears that it's not normal? I myself have never used one (you know what I mean! ) let alone seen one.

Hypothetically if I was to go down on you (or any LT girls) would you automatically use a dam or only if asked??

 

[sexnut]

What if you trust each other and present medical certificates? Not so risky then right?

 

[McLuvin]

Actually I think that statistics prove otherwise.
One is more likely to be infected by your pick up from a pub or a club.
Seems we are bent on demonising our working ladies for no proven reason.

I know who I would trust with my sexual health.

I'm not disagreeing. I'm married and all of my sexual contact is with WL's in massage parlours that supposedly test their girls regularly.

There are clean and responsible WL's, no doubt about that. Just like there are responsible contractors that don't overbill you for the amount of cement used on a project. Again, it's one of those things that saying X profession fall into category A or B... there are going to be all types. One still has to mix in those who keep on working after they are infected with this or that because it's not like they are just doing it for the social good... they still have bills to pay even if they have herpes or whatever.... Agree that natural pick ups in pubs or clubs don't regularly get themselves tested either. It's not a black or white statement I'm making here.