Recent content by buttercookie

Nicolette White ad says allows filming, pictures for extra. Check her Ad on Scarlet Blue

You are correct but had skills that made up it

Nicolette White search on Scarlet Blue

Imogen from Esquire

Pictures and description are accurate, pretty face, a bit of ink, good conversation and nice enough girl but for $550 plus plus there’s nothing in the service that would make me return. I’d have felt better donating to the Salvation Army Appeal.

Saw London recently. Mid 30’s, very lean, tanned, enhanced bolt ons, very soft massage, lots of B2B, good tease, gentle HJ that built to climax. Unsure if extras as I didn’t ask. I’d go back out of curiosity but no rush.

15yrs? Ad says she is 25. Something doesn’t compute.

But they’re better looking than their clients who all think they look like Brad Pitt and George Clooney

Looks to good to be true and those rates look Asian massage inspired. But great if all true. Good luck

Kosmo

Could be a sway the swinging voter?

If supply is increasing, Prices aren’t coming down. We need to find a politician in the election campaign to add it to the rising cost of living debate.

Esquire back then was only RnT on Oxford St Leederville with communal showers and the talent was good. Tudor Lane also had great chicks. Anyone remember Porscha or Tayla?

Thing of the past. Was rampant years ago till cleaned up by men in blue.

Ad says photos for illustration purposes and photos verified. Other E&B ads don’t seem to run both disclaimer. Which is correct?